Toward a Theology of Movement:

Summary

Gary T. Waldecker

1.1 Introduction

Mission to the World has made "church planting movements" the central motif of its new philosophy of ministry called New Horizons. The phrase "church planting movements" has often been used in reference to sociological phenomena involved in the rapid development of churches. My purpose in writing "Toward a Theology of Movement" 1 is to see what the Bible says theologically about movements—with application to the South American context. The intent is to provide a biblical framework 2 within which to work as we make and implement our plans for church planting movements in our various contexts. 3

It's not that before New Horizons no one ever thought of movements. This was probably always everyone's hope. The previous focus, however, was more on forming a presbytery and getting out. The movement would occur once it was handed over to nationals. Now the focus is: what should we be doing from the very beginning if we would like to see a movement happen in the future? To what extent and in what ways may our previous paradigm have actually prevented movements from occurring? What are the biblical parameters within which we should develop our plans for movement?

1.2 God's Plan for a Movement

The story of Scripture, from beginning to end, can legitimately be viewed in terms of God's great plan for a movement in human history. It is a movement from the glory of creation to the greater glory of the new heavens and earth. 4

Since the church is a central part of God's kingdom movement, church planting movements must be understood in terms of God's plan for the coming of the kingdom. Many of the keys to understanding this movement are found in the creation account. We miss this important focus of Scripture by not sufficiently taking into account creation and its implications as the backdrop against which the fall and redemption occur. While we want to avoid speculation about what would have happened if Adam had not sinned, we also want to take into account the revelation surrounding creation, the creation ordinances, and their implications for what God had (and has) in mind for the human race. 5

A tentative definition of a church planting movement: The supernatural and often rapid growth, reproduction and expansion of the church among a people group that has a transforming effect on its culture, produced by the unleashing of Christ's power among God's people as a whole, freeing them from the power of idols and enabling them in the midst of weakness and apparent failures to use their gifts to empower one another and so produce synergy for the work of the kingdom.

1.3 Seven Aspects of God's Movement

In my book I identify what I consider to be seven aspects of God's great movement from glory to greater glory. After writing the book, I noticed that each of these corresponds more or less with a traditional division of systematic theology, as shown in the following table:

All of these except the seventh are implied in God's revelation of himself in creation. 6 We will now look at the basic idea of each of these seven aspects of God's kingdom movement and the primary implications of each for our task in South America. Please note that the specific implications for different contexts may vary. It is the task of each church planting team to work out the implications within its particular setting.

1.3.1 The Upward Movement

a. The Basic Idea

Implied in creation is a movement from glory to greater glory. Mankind and creation were to become increasingly reflective of God's glory, culminating in the glorification of God's people and the new heavens and earth. It is because God set things up this way that everyone has what we might call "longings for glory".

This "upward movement" from glory to greater glory includes three main aspects.

These three aspects of the upward movement, then, have to do with our "knowing," "doing," and "being." They correspond to the three main ways God has revealed himself to us: through his name (who he is), through his works (what he does) and through his authoritative word (what he says).

b. Longings for Glory

Because God made us for greater glory, we all have deep-seated longings for glory. These longings tend to cluster around the three aspects of the upward movement as follows:

c. Priority Systems

No one can escape these longings, because they are part of what it means to be the image of God. However, different personalities, corporate cultures and national cultures tend to lead out with (or give priority to) certain aspects of these longings. These basic "priority systems" are the basis for the primary differences in personality and culture. They constitute fundamental paradigms through which we interpret everything. 10 In this way we all reflect God's glory in different ways and it's only in relationship with each other that we can get a clearer picture of who God is.

We might also call these priority systems "core values," a phrase used much today in the business world. I prefer the phrase "priority systems." There are many good and legitimate ways of going about accomplishing the many good options before us. It is necessary and good that we give priority to certain things or ways of doing things, because no one can do everything at once. Furthermore, everyone is better at doing certain things in certain ways.

The fact that we have different legitimate priority systems is complicated by the fact that we all tend to make an idol out of our priority system—that is, we depend on the strengths inherent in it rather than on Christ to find meaning, security, love and fulfillment.

d. Primary Implications

We will not see a church planting movement occur if we do not understand our own personal and national priority systems, (along with their particular configuration of longings) as well as the priority system of the people we are trying to reach. What are the particular longings for glory these people give priority to? How has this been affected by sin?

Too often we have used a "flat" eschatology—a return to Eden instead of a journey to something better—which tends to condemn longings for glory as sinful (but see below where I talk about how sin affects these longings.) Because we see all too clearly the ways sin affects these longings, we have "thrown the baby out with the bath water." Of course, there is always the danger of people seeing Christ as the fulfiller of selfish desires and the supporter of fragile egos. But it is an equally great danger to separate legitimate longings rooted in creation from Christ. Evangelicals in South America, for example, are known as people whose "religion" consists in a long list of prohibitions. Or the longings for glory are separated into a different "compartment" of life. They have nothing to do with God. As a result, "religion" is seen as not relating to the deep longings that move people.

For example, the US culture has traditionally given priority to the aspects of longing related to doing: achievement, power, control, domination, making and reaching goals. Also, Plato's emphasis on knowing has influenced our culture deeply. Furthermore, the Presbyterian corporate culture has often given priority to longings related to knowledge. Most Latin cultures, on the other hand, tend to lead out with enjoyment and relationships.

To the extent that we don't understand these differences, it is easy for miscommunication of the gospel to occur. We tend to design our ministry systems around our own priorities of "knowing" and "doing" in ways that only come to light as we deal with a culture that leads out with "being". And even then sometimes we don't see it. To the extent that we design our ministry systems around knowing and doing, we can unwittingly criticize and condemn as wrong or inferior the Latin American priority system.

For example, if our training ministry structures 11 are designed in such a way that they lead out with "knowing," we might inadvertently be communicating that the emphasis they give to relationships is unimportant. In fact, they might become increasingly aware of the ways sin has affected their priority system and find the solution in switching to an emphasis on "knowing" instead of seeing how Christ can transform their relationships. They would see us as saying: "The way to have good relationships is to understand Scripture and the world." Unless we are careful, they could easily see us as attacking the postulate they grew up with: "The way to attain true understanding is to have and develop good relationships." These are two priority systems that both reflect God's glory. But unless we are careful, they might end up interpreting everything we say and do through this filter: "Following Christ means changing our priority system for theirs."

I've seen one of two reactions when two priority systems that are both legitimate are (usually unwittingly) set in opposition to each other: some people think our message sounds foreign and go to the Pentecostal church, which does lead out with relationships. Others "convert" to our priority system and a church or denomination is planted which does not resonate with the mainstream culture because it has become a subculture. In either case, we will not see a church planting movement occur. Even elements of the target group which (because of business connections or whatever) have come to appreciate our priority system, still have deep-seated Latin tendencies that must be taken into account. In most Latin American cultures, we probably need to think in terms of leading out with relationships, and designing our ministry structures accordingly. Then we need to bring in our good doctrine, planning and organization. That is, let learning and ministry flow out of a Christ-centered focus on relationships.

Another concern relating to priority systems has to do with the organizational priorities that have become a part of Mission to the World because it is embedded in the culture of the United States and because of the business model that (in my opinion) has been a part of it for so long. Because priority systems are often somewhat unconscious—involving relatively unexamined assumptions inherited from the culture at large—there will be a temptation for Mission to the Word to apply its stated core values (God's glory, God's grace, God's church and God's family) in a restrictive way. In other words, these core values might be applied within the context of those cultural assumptions, in a way that fails to challenge them. The result would be that these hidden assumptions turn out to be the real core values of the organization. The stated core values, for example, might be applied to the growth and development of individuals within the organization, while the organizational policies, structures and decision-making might continue to be controlled by cultural assumptions that overvalue efficiency, control and measurable results. In what follows I will give some examples.

1.3.2 The Inward Movement

a. The Basic Idea

The Inward Movement has to do with how the Upward Movement occurs. Creation does not contain within itself the power to achieve the upward movement. In fact, without God's supernatural intervention everything tends toward disorder. 12 It's as if God planted the seeds of the kingdom in creation, but without his watering they will never grow or produce fruit. God "waters" by revealing himself, until he fully reveals himself in Christ. The Inward Movement is God moving closer and closer to his people—revealing himself—until he finally moves inside. It is "Christ in you" that is the only "hope of glory." 13 Christ is God's power source for effecting the upward movement: from image to glorified image, from garden to city, and from implicit authority and knowledge to all authority and knowledge. 14

Because of the fall, our longings for glory become self-centered. Instead of being thrilled at reflecting God's glory in a greater way, as the moon reflects the light of the sun, we want to be the sun. Furthermore, we look for means of fulfillment that are self-centered. Scripture contrasts Christ with idols. Idols are pseudo power sources to find the fulfillment of our longings for glory. As mentioned earlier, it is easy for us to make an idol out of our priority system because of the strengths inherent in it. That is, we tend to depend on the strength our priority system gives us rather than on Christ to find the fulfillment of our longings for glory. As Christians, we are no longer controlled by idols, but we struggle daily with their "left-overs" (hidden habits and thought patterns) lurking in the flesh.

b. The Primary Implications

Facilitating a movement requires an intentional focus on being Christ-centered because Christ is the only power source for effecting a true movement. I expect most people will react to this by saying "Of course. That is obvious." However, I believe many churches end up viewing Christ through the filters of such cultural priorities as efficiency, results and control. Christ becomes to us merely the one who can give us strength to be efficient, get results and exercise control. This is so not only for the personal life, but especially for the ministry structures we use.

For example, our US culture has traditionally led out with "doing," and this has affected Mission to the World. Although I have appreciated MTW's emphasis on planning, its goal orientation and Management by Objectives, I think New Horizons is a call to recognize that our ministry structures have tended to reflect an over dependence on our ability to plan and get things done. 15 While not rejecting good planning, New Horizons is a call away from a business model that could almost try to engineer a church plant, to a more Christ-centered model. Of course, no one ever intended that we not be Christ centered. What we're talking about here is our "corporate flesh" that will ever be tempting us to rely on our strengths, and ever showing itself in different ways. 16

As Presbyterians we tend to lead out with "knowing." Our good doctrine is a gift God has given us to share with others. However, I think we have a tendency to depend on our good doctrine rather than on Christ. We have tended to think that if we just give them the "words" they will somehow automatically have their character changed and be able to transform their culture. If we just give them the words, somehow God takes care of the rest. This is mostly evident in our traditional training models.

The overall effect on MTW's previous paradigm was something like this: "The task is difficult, but with good planning and our good doctrine, not impossible." The paradigm shift we would like to see happen is something like this: "The task of ministry before us is not difficult. Rather, it is impossible. The only way we can see a movement happen or even begin to happen is through the supernatural power of Christ being brought to bear on the situation. Doing ministry is like walking on water—attempting the impossible in the name of Christ. We must examine all our ministry structures to see if they might reflect an over-dependence on our doctrine or ability to get things done or anything else, and make any necessary corrections. We need to rediscover what Christ has to do with how we structure our ministries.

Much so-called Christian psychology has presented Christ in a self-centered way: Christ the fulfiller of your dreams and the solution to your frustrations. While there is an important element of truth here, as we have seen, the problem has been that people are not challenged to see the ways in which their longings are self-centered and how they depend on sources of strength other than Christ. As we reach out to a given culture, we should be formulated in an emergent way. Instead of overestimating our ability to control through planning, we should focus on learning as we go within an overarching and general vision.

In South America, this means, for example, affirming the importance of relationships, while at the same time condemning the tendency to depend on one's ability to develop or manipulate relationships to makes one's way in life and find fulfillment. It means, for example, condemning the tendency not to follow Matthew 18 when there is a relational problem because of the desire not to "make things worse."

1.3.3 The Outward Movement

a. The Basic Idea

According to John 7:37-39, if we drink of Christ there will be a disproportionate result: one sip of Christ and whole rivers flow out from us to bless those around. According to John, the rivers refer to the Holy Spirit. Christ empowers us by giving us his Spirit. All we need to do is drink of Christ instead of depending on any other supposed source of power—including our gifts and the strengths inherent in our priority systems. The Lord uses those who are united to him to bring about the upward movement—to bring in his kingdom.

b. The Primary Implications

God could have chosen to accomplish the work of the kingdom without us. For example, he created the world without working through us. Since creation, however, he has chosen to accomplish his purposes through his people. God's normal way of accomplishing his purpose in human history is not by working on his own, but by working through his people.

The task before us is not difficult—it is impossible. However, the Lord will do the impossible through us. As the Lord commanded the man with the withered hand to stretch it out, as he commanded the paralytic to stand and walk, and as he commanded Peter to walk to him on the water, so we must attempt the impossible trusting only in the supernatural power of Christ, refusing dependence on "safer" methods.

Whereas before we would focus on a quantifiable goal, now it is more clear that the goal is impossible—a church planting movement. There is a shift away from focusing on the goal to an increased focus on the processes that we need to put in place to facilitate a church planting movement, and how these processes will be reproduced in our trainees—and in theirs.

As we drink of Christ, the river overflows in various ways: thankfulness, prayer, and love toward God, as well as love for others, and power for the impossible. Here is the power for movement. As we learn to look to Christ not only individually, but also corporately, the Holy Spirit flows out like a might river to do the impossible through his people.

1.3.4 The Centripetal Movement

a. The Basic Idea

When God "came down" to see what was happening at Babel he said, "Now nothing they attempt will be impossible for them." It's not that God was worried, but he was making the point that there is strength in unity, whether for good or for evil. Pentecost appears to be a kind of reversal of Babel. Now God is forming a people for whom nothing will be impossible for good—to the extent that they are united. The Centripetal movement is Christ drawing his people together around himself, thus producing a synergy and a result that goes beyond what might be otherwise expected The Centripetal movement is the orchestration of the rivers of life flowing out of all God's people in such a way that they are working together and not against each other.

b. The Primary Implications

MTW teams should take more time to understand each other's deep priority systems or core values (personality) in order to create greater synergy and avoid misunderstanding. Then they need to talk about the priority system or core values of the team and show how the individual core values can fit into the team core values. One of the keys to facilitating a movement is a leader who is able to show how the different personalities and gifts of many different people can truly dovetail into a powerful vision and philosophy of ministry. That is, someone who is able to harness the differences on a team into a unified direction—however, he must do this without stripping people of their unique individuality. In other words, he must be able to facilitate a deep unity that does not swallow up the rich diversity of the team. Unity without diversity will produce a team of unfulfilled missionaries. On the other hand, he must be able to facilitate a rich diversity that does not swallow up the deep unity as expressed in the team purpose and philosophy of ministry. Diversity without unity creates a team in which everyone is pulling in different directions. I must stress that this ability to facilitate unity in diversity is not a product simply of a certain personality type and does not come more automatically to "national" leaders than to missionaries. It does involve giftedness, but is primarily the result of maturity in the Lord. 17

In MTW's previous paradigm, we tended to over depend on (make an idol of) our U.S. resources and to downplay the important role of national resources (particularly human resources). The idea was that we would establish a presbytery (after all, we know how to get things done) and then, when it was finished, turn it over to nationals. 18 In some sectors of the PCA today there is a tendency to go too far in the other direction: just support nationals because you get a bigger "bang for you buck." The truth is that many of the national leaders we partner with have been brought up in one of those sub-culture denominations that might know less about reaching out to the mainstream culture than we do. Furthermore, every culture has its blind spots.

In any case, what New Horizons calls us to is synergy. This idea was not absent previously, being especially noticeable in MTW's concept of teamwork. However, the concept needs to be applied more broadly to include synergy with nationals. We have blind spots as much as they do. We need each other. We need to establish a bridge between the two cultures where both can meet and learn:" a place where the most mature leaders from each culture learn to love and appreciate one another as they work together. In this way they can develop a strategy for reaching the country that neither could develop alone. We also need to think in terms of partnering—to whatever extent possible—with other elements of the body of Christ in our area and within our own PCA. 19

Another implication has to do with the PCA's present focus on the 10-40 window. I'm not sure, but sometimes I think this is another case of the US "we can do it" attitude. Maybe the difficulty we experience in reaching the 10-40 window is God saying," You can't do this by yourself. You will need the combined strength and synergy that comes from uniting with churches from other cultures." Maybe we need to join with the Latin American, Chinese and African churches—learn from each other and work together—in order to get the job done.

1.3.5 The Forward Movement

a. The Basic Idea

In Scripture God is always sending his people moving. This journey that initially aimed at the promised land comes to a climax when Jesus sends his church moving ("go"). 20 into the whole world. And how do we complete the journey? What is Jesus' strategy? Make disciples! 21 This includes evangelizing and baptizing new believers as well as teaching new and old believers about Jesus' commands and their implications for all of life. This discipleship produces continuous waves of believers / disciplers who push us forward into the future.

b. The Primary Implications

It's always easier to do it yourself—especially for someone from the U.S. culture, which so highly values getting things done. Of course, if you are beginning a new church plant and there are no nationals to work with you, you have to do everything yourself. As converts appear, we know we need to invest in them, but we're so busy getting all the ministries going and making contacts that we postpone discipleship. Or we use the typical Presbyterian shortcut to discipleship: hand them some books and give them some classes (see below). As time goes on, however, we get more irons in the fire, and have less time to invest in others. Things go well until we have to leave and the whole thing falls apart or is unable to continue forward because there are no adequately trained leaders.

We will not see a church planting movement happen if we are not investing in others in such a way that they will catch the vision and learn how to invest in still others, and so on. The way we complete the journey and finally arrive home is by making all our ministry structures revolve around the priority of facilitating waves of disciples (like when you throw a stone in a pond and concentric waves are formed). We must examine all our ministry structures to see to what extent they might reflect a tendency to "do it ourselves" instead of investing in others.

Furthermore, we must become experts at identifying the "age" of a church we are planting or individual we are discipling. The nature of our relationship with the church or individual depends on its "age." 22 There are parallels between planting a church or discipling an individual on the one hand and bringing up children on the other. The kind and amount of support they receive from us depends on their "age." 23 We want to see them move from dependence toward a sense of clear identity and interdependence.

1.3.6 The Spiral Movement

a. The Basic Idea

According to Scripture, you can't really know and understand God's Word and world unless you obey. Otherwise you just have head knowledge. Furthermore, you can't obey unless you love. Otherwise you are just going through the outward motions. But further still, you can't love unless you understand. Otherwise your love will be misguided.

On the other hand, the more you obey the more you know. And the more you know the more you love. And the more you love, the more you obey. God disciples us by connecting our knowing, doing and being (reflecting his words, works and name or character 24) in a kind of spiral movement that gains momentum as we go around. I call this "covenantal training." 25 This is how we should disciple and train our leaders. We need to focus on how knowledge, life/ministry and personal character relate to one another. Any good training program will focus on how these three connect in the life of the trainee. It's the connections that have been overlooked and require out attention.

Presbyterians tend to over depend on the transmission of information to train people. So we often get stuck there and do not go around the spiral very well. We assume that if they get the knowledge, the character development and cultural transformation will follow in a somewhat automatic way. Pentecostals, on the other hand, (who in Chile, at least, have said "the letter kills") tend to over rely on the experience of their relationship with God and their ability to relate to others. Some of them very rarely ever get to the words of God. They assume that knowledge will somehow automatically follow because of their focus on the Sprit and his presence. It isn't wrong to "lead out" with one or the other of these, but we do need to avoid over depending on (making an idol of) any one of them.

b. The Primary Implications

In most parts of South America, training should probably lead out with relationships instead of with information or ministry activity and programs. In many cases the ministry activity we give trainees is more designed to help us reach our goals than to invest in them. In South America, however, it is within the context of a trusting relationship that the disciple will "hear" the words more effectively. Ministry structures for training should be designed in such a way that they begin with the relationship, and then continually relate our being, knowing and doing. It isn't enough to add a practical theology section to the academic training, because very often the academic and practical are not related to each other, with the result that the theology is dry and the practice is more informed by cultural norms than by Scripture. 26

Another implication is that the missionary trainer is also a learner. Every culture—as well as every personality type—tends to ask different questions of Scripture. If the trainer allows only the questions he or she is familiar with to be asked, and if the trainer does not encourage the trainee to look for answers that are deeply embedded within, then the "relationship" is probably experienced by the trainee as utilitarian.

Recently in MTW there has been much talk about "Word and Deed" ministries. In my opinion, all ministries in MTW should be not only Word and Deed, but also Presence ministries. That is, it isn't enough to tell them the truth and do things for them. We also need to be with them—to develop and cherish the personal relationships that are so highly valued in Latin cultures. In fact, in South America, we probably need to lead out with Presence, even though our strongest gift is probably our good doctrine. We need to bring that doctrine to bear within the context of our presence and relationships so that the culture is transformed.

So here are some important maxims when it comes to training: